XVI ORDINARY GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE SYNOD OF BISHOPS First Session (4-29 October 2023)
Synthesis Report A SYNODAL CHURCH IN MISSION
INTRODUCTION
Dear Sisters, dear Brothers
”For in the one Spirit we were all baptized into one body” (1 Cor 12:13). This is the experience, full of joy and gratitude, that we have had in this First Session of the Synodal
Assembly held from 4 to 29 October 2023 on the theme “For a Synodal Church. Communion, Participation, Mission”. Despite our diversity of backgrounds, languages and cultures, through the common grace of Baptism we have been able to live these days together with one heart and spirit.
We have sought to sing like a choir, many voices as though expressing one soul. The Holy Spirit has gifted us with an experience of the harmony that He alone can generate; it is a
gift and a witness in a world that is torn and divided.
Our Assembly has taken place while wars both old and new have raged in the world, with dramatic consequences that are impacting upon countless victims. The cry of those who
are poor resounded among us, of those forced to migrate and of those suffering violence and the devastating consequences of climate change. We heard their cry not only through the media, but also through the voices of many present, who are personally involved in these tragic events whether through their families or their people. We have all, at all times, taken this cry into our hearts and prayers, wondering how our Churches can foster paths of reconciliation, hope,justice and peace.
Our meeting took place in Rome, gathered around the successor of Peter, who confirmed us in our faith and encouraged us to be audacious in our mission. It was a grace to
begin these days with an ecumenical vigil, which saw the leaders and representatives of the other Churches and Christian communities praying together with the Pope at the tomb of Peter.
Unity ferments silently within the Holy Church of God; we see it with our own eyes, and we bear witness to it full of joy. “How very good and pleasant it is when kindred live together in unity” (Ps 133:1).
At the behest of the Holy Father, the Assembly saw other members of the People of God gathered together and around the bishops. The bishops, united among themselves and with the Bishop of Rome, made manifest the Church as a communion of Churches. Lay people, those in consecrated life, deacons and priests were, together with the bishops, witnesses of a process that intends to involve the whole Church and everyone in the Church. Their presence reminded us that the Assembly is not an isolated event, but an integral part and a necessary step in the synodal process. The multiplicity of interventions and the plurality of positions voiced in the Assembly revealed a Church that is learning to embrace a synodal style and is seeking the most suitable ways to make this happen.
It is more than two years since we began the journey that has led us to this Session. After the opening of the synodal process on 9 October 2021, all the Churches, albeit at different paces, have engaged in a listening process at diocesan, national and continental stages, the results of which were recorded in their respective documents.
This Session opened the phase in which the entire Church received the fruits of this consultation in order to discern, in prayer and dialogue, the paths that the Spirit is asking us to follow. This phase will last until October 2024, when the Second Session of the Assembly will complete its work, offering it to the Holy Father.
The entire journey, rooted in the Tradition of the Church, is taking place in the light of conciliar teaching. The Second Vatican Council was, in fact, like a seed sown in the field of
the world and the Church. The soil in which it germinated and grew was the daily lives of believers, the experience of the Churches of every people and culture, the many testimonies of holiness, and the reflections of theologians. The Synod 2021-2024 continues to draw on the energy of that seed and to develop its potential. The synodal path is, in fact, implementing what the Council taught about the Church as Mystery and People of God, called to holiness.
It values the contribution all the baptised make, according to their respective vocations, in helping us to understand better and practice the Gospel. In this sense, it constitutes a true act of further reception of the Council, prolonging its inspiration and reinvigorating its prophetic force for today’s world.
After a month of work, the Lord is now calling us to return to our Churches to hand over to all of you the fruits of our work and to continue the journey together. Here in Rome,
we were not many, but the purpose of the Synod path called by the Holy Father is to involve all the baptised. We ardently desire this to happen and want to commit ourselves to making it possible. In this Synthesis Report we have collected the main elements that emerged in the dialogue, prayer and discussion that characterised these days. Our personal stories will enrich this synthesis with the tenor of lived experience, which no document can adequately capture.
We will thus be able to testify to the richness of our experience of listening, of silence and sharing, and of prayer. We will also share that it is not easy to listen to different ideas, without immediately giving in to the temptation to counter the views expressed; or to offer one’s contribution as a gift for others and not as something absolute or certain.
However, the Lord’s grace has led us to achieve this, despite our limitations, and this has been for us a true experience of synodality. By having practised it, we understand it better and have grasped its value.
We understood, in fact, that walking together as baptised persons, in the diversity of charisms, vocations, and ministries, is important not only for our communities, but also for the world. Evangelical solidarity is like a lamp, which must not be placed under a bushel, but on a lampstand so that it may shed light on the whole house (cf. Mt 5:15). The world needs this testimony today more than ever. As disciples of Jesus, we cannot shirk the responsibility of demonstrating and transmitting the love and tenderness of God to a wounded humanity.
The work of this Session was carried out in accordance with the ‘roadmap’ laid down in the Instrumentum laboris, by means of which the Assembly was able to reflect on the
characteristic signs of a synodal Church and the dynamics of communion, mission and participation that it contains. We were able to discuss the merits of issues, identify themes in need of in-depth study, and take forward a preliminary set of proposals. In the light of the progress made, the Synthesis Report does not repeat or reiterate all the contents of the Instrumentum laboris; rather, it gives new impetus to the questions and themes we considered to be priorities. It is not a final document, but an instrument at the service of ongoing discernment.
The Synthesis Report is structured in three parts.
The first outlines “the face of the synodal Church”, presenting the practice and understanding of synodality and its theological
underpinning. Here it is presented first and foremost as a spiritual experience that stems from contemplation of the Trinity and unfolds by articulating unity and variety in the Church.
The second part, entitled “All disciples, all missionaries”, deals with all those involved in the life and mission of the Church and their relationships with one another. In this part, synodality is mainly presented as a joint journey of the People of God and as a fruitful dialogue between the charisms and ministries at the service of the coming of the Kingdom.
The third part bears the title “Weaving bonds, building community”. Here, synodality is presented mainly as a set of processes and as a network of bodies enabling exchange between the Churches and dialogue with the world.
In each of the three parts, individual chapters bring together convergences, matters for consideration and proposals that emerged from the dialogue.
The convergences identify specific points that orientate reflection, akin to a map that helps us find our way.
The matters for consideration summarise points about which it is necessary to continue deepening our understanding pastorally, theologically, and canonically. This is like being at a crossroads where we need to pause so we can understand better the direction we need to take.
The proposals indicate possible paths that can be taken. Some are suggested, others recommended, others still requested with some strength and determination.
In the coming months, Episcopal Conferences as well as the hierarchical structures of the Eastern Catholic Churches, serving as a link between the local Churches and the General Secretariat of the Synod, will play an important role in developing our reflections. Taking their starting point from the convergences already reached, they are called to focus on the questions and proposals that are considered most urgent. They are asked to encourage a deepening of the issues both pastorally and theologically, and to indicate their canonical implications.
We carry in our hearts the desire, sustained by hope, that the climate of mutual listening and sincere dialogue that we experienced during the days of common work in Rome will radiate in our communities and throughout the world, at the service of the growth of the good seed of the Kingdom of God.
///////////////////////////////////////
PART I – THE FACE OF THE SYNODAL CHURCH
1. Synodality: Experience and Understanding
Convergences
a) We welcomed the invitation to recognise the synodal dimension of the Church with a new awareness. Synodal practice is attested to in the New Testament and the Early Church,
taking particular historical forms in different Churches and traditions. The Second Vatican Council “updated” this practice, and Pope Francis has once again encouraged the Church to renew it.
The Synod 2021-2024 is part of this renewal. Through it, the Holy People of God have discovered that a synodal way of being silent, praying, listening, and speaking, rooted in the Word of God and in joyful, if also sometimes painful encounters, leads to a deeper awareness that we are all brothers and sisters in Christ. An invaluable fruit of this process is the heightened awareness of our identity as the faithful People of God, within which each is the bearer of a dignity derived from Baptism, and each is called to differentiated co-responsibility for the common mission of evangelisation.
b) This process has renewed our experience of and desire for the Church as God’s home and family, a Church that is closer to the lives of Her people, less bureaucratic and more
relational. The terms “synodal” and “synodality” have been associated with this experience and desire, offering an understanding that now requires further clarification. This is the Church that young people first declared they desired in 2018 on the occasion of the Synod of Youth.
c) The manner in which the Assembly proceeded in the Paul VI Hall, including the seating of people in small groups at round tables, was likened for some cultures to the biblical
image of the wedding banquet (Rev 19:9). This was understood as emblematic of a synodal way of being Church and an image of the Eucharist, which is the source and summit of
synodality, with the Word of God at the centre. In a Church that is living synodally, different cultures, languages, rites, ways of thinking, and realities can engage together and
fruitfully in a sincere search for the Spirit’s guidance.
d) In our midst there have been sisters and brothers coming from peoples afflicted by war, martyrdom, persecution, and famine. The plight of their people, unable often to participate in the synodal process, has nevertheless entered into the cycle of our discussions and prayers, deepening our sense of communion with them and our determination to be peacemakers.
e) The Assembly frequently spoke of hope, healing, reconciliation, and restoration of trust among the many gifts the Spirit has poured out on the Church during this synodal process.
Openness to listening and accompanying all, including those who have suffered abuse and hurt in the Church, has made visible many who have long felt invisible. The long journey towards reconciliation and justice, including addressing the structural conditions that abetted such abuse, remains before us, and requires concrete gestures of penitence.
f) We know that “synodality” is a term unfamiliar to many members of the People of God, causing some people confusion and concern. Among the fears expressed is that the
teaching of the Church will be changed, causing us to depart from the Apostolic faith of our forebears and, in so doing, will fail to respond to needs of those who hunger and thirst
for God today. However, we are confident that synodality is an expression of the dynamic and living Tradition.
g) Without being dismissive of the importance of representative democracy, Pope Francis responds to the concern expressed by some that the Synod may become a body of majority deliberation denuded of its ecclesial and spiritual character, so jeopardising the hierarchical nature of the Church. It is clear that some people are afraid that they will be
forced to change; others fear that nothing at all will change or that there will be too little courage to move at the pace of the living Tradition. Also, perplexity and opposition can
sometimes conceal a fear of losing power and the privileges that derive from it.
In all cultural contexts, however, the terms “synodal” and “synodality” speak of a mode of being Church that integrates communion, mission, and participation. An example is the Ecclesial Conference of the Amazon (CEAMA), a fruit of the synodal missionary process in the region.
h) In its broadest sense, synodality can be understood as Christians walking in communion with Christ toward the Kingdom along with the whole of humanity. Its orientation is
towards mission, and its practice involves gathering in assembly at each level of ecclesial life. It involves reciprocal listening, dialogue, community discernment, and creation of
consensus as an expression that renders Christ present in the Holy Spirit, each taking decisions in accordance with their responsibilities.
i) Through experience and encounters, we have grown together in this awareness. In summary, from the very first days, the Assembly found itself shaped by two convictions:
the first is that the experience we have shared over these years is authentically Christian and should be embraced in all its richness and depth; the second is that the terms “synodal” and “synodality” require a more accurate clarification of their levels of meaning in different cultures. The substantial agreement emerged that, with the necessary
clarifications, synodality represents the future of the Church.
Matters for Consideration
j) Building on the reflective work already undertaken, there is a need to clarify the meaning of synodality at different levels, in pastoral, theological, and canonical terms. This helps to avert the risk that the concept sounds too vague or generic or appears as a fad or fashion.
It enables us to offer a broad understanding of walking together with further theological deepening and clarification. Likewise, it is necessary to clarify the relationship between
synodality and communion and between synodality and collegiality.
k) A desire emerged to enhance understanding and appreciation of the differences in the practice and understanding of synodality between the tradition of the Christian East and
the Latin Tradition, including in this ongoing synodal process, by fostering encounters between them.
l) In particular, the many expressions of synodal life in cultural contexts where people are used to walking together as a community and where individualism has not taken root,
should be considered for deeper reflection. In this way, synodal practice plays an important part in the Church’s prophetic response to an individualism that causes people to turn in on themselves, a populism that divides, and a globalisation that homogenises and flattens.
Although not solving these problems, it nonetheless provides an alternative way of being and acting for our times, integrating a diversity of perspectives. This is a hopeful
alternative that needs further exploration and illumination.
Proposals
m) The richness and depth of the synodal process indicates the value of expanding participation, and overcoming the obstacles to participation that have emerged so far.
n) There is a need to find ways to involve the clergy (deacons, priests, bishops) more actively in the synodal process during the course of the next year. A synodal Church cannot do
without their voices, experiences or contributions. We need to understanding better the reasons why some have felt resistant to the synodal process.
o) The synodal culture needs to become more intergenerational, with spaces for young people to speak freely for themselves, within their families, and with their peers and pastors, including through digital channels.
p) The Assembly proposes to promote theological deepening of the terminological and conceptual understanding of the notion and practice of synodality before the Second
Session of the Assembly, drawing on the rich heritage of theological research since the Second Vatican Council and in particular the documents of the International Theological
Commission on Synodality in the life and mission of the Church (2018) and Sensus fidei in the life of the Church (2014).
q) The canonical implications of synodality require similar clarification. For these, too, we propose an intercontinental special commission of theological and canonical experts,
ahead of the Second Session of the Assembly.
r) Finally, a wider revision of the Code of Canon Law and the Code of Canon Law of the Oriental Churches is called for at this time. A preliminary study is therefore advised.
2. Gathered and Sent by the Trinity
Convergences
a) According to the teaching of the Second Vatican Council, the Church is “a people brought together by virtue of the unity of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit” (LG 4). The
Father, through the mission of the Son and the gift of the Spirit, involves us in a dynamism of communion and mission that moves us from the “I” to the “we” and places us at the
service of the world.
Synodality translates the Trinitarian dynamism with which God comes to meet humanity into spiritual attitudes and ecclesial processes. For this to happen, it is necessary for all the baptized to commit themselves to the reciprocal exercise of their vocation, charism, and ministry. Only in this way can the Church truly become a “conversation” (cf. Ecclesiam suam 67) within itself and with the world, walking side by side with every human being in the style of Jesus.
b) Since the origins, the Church’s synodal journey is oriented toward the Kingdom, which will be fully accomplished when God is all in all. The witness of ecclesial fraternity and
missionary dedication to the service of the least will never measure up to the Mystery of which they are also a sign and instrument. The Church does not reflect on its synodal
configuration in order to place itself at the centre of the proclamation, but to best fulfil, even in its constitutive incompleteness, its service to the coming of the Kingdom.
c) The renewal of the Christian community is possible only by recognizing the primacy of grace. If spiritual depth is lacking, synodality remains cosmetic. What we are called to,
however, is not only to translate into community processes a spiritual experience gained elsewhere, but more deeply to experience how reciprocal relationships are the place and
form of an authentic encounter with God. In this sense, while drawing on the rich spiritual heritage of the Tradition, the synodal perspective contributes to renewing its forms: of a prayer open to participation, a discernment lived together, and a missionary energy that arises from sharing and that radiates as service.
d) Conversation in the Spirit is a tool that, even with its limitations, enables authentic listening in order to discern what the Spirit is saying to the Churches. Its practice has elicited joy, awe and gratitude and has been experienced as a path of renewal that transforms individuals, groups, and the Church. The word “conversation” expresses more than mere
dialogue: it interweaves thought and feeling, creating a shared vital space. hat is why we can say that conversion is at play in conversation. This is an anthropological reality found
in different peoples and cultures, who gather together in solidarity to deal with and decide matters vital to the community.
Grace brings this human experience to fruition. Conversing “in the Spirit” means living the experience of sharing in the light of faith and seeking God’s will in an authentically evangelical atmosphere within which the Holy Spirit’s unmistakable voice can be heard.
e) Since synodality is ordered to mission, Christian communities are to enter into solidarity with those of other religions, convictions and cultures, thus avoiding, on the one hand, the risk of self-referentiality and self-preservation, and on the other hand the risk of loss of identity. The logic of dialogue, expressed in mutual learning and journeying together must come to characterize evangelical proclamation, service to those experiencing poverty, care for our common home, and theological research.
Matters for Consideration
f) To bring about true listening to the Father’s will, it seems necessary to deepen the criteria of ecclesial discernment from a theological perspective so that the reference to the freedom and newness of the Spirit is appropriately coordinated with the fact that Jesus Christ comes “once for all” (Heb 10:10). This implies, first of all, to specify the relationship between listening to the Word of God attested to in Scripture, the reception of Tradition and the Magisterium of the Church, and the prophetic reading of the signs of the times.
g) To this end, it is crucial to promote anthropological and spiritual visions capable of integrating and not merely juxtaposing the intellectual and emotional dimensions of faith
experience, overcoming any and all reductionism and dualism between reason and feeling.
h) It is important to clarify how conversation in the Spirit can integrate the contributions of theological thought and the humanities and social sciences, alongside other models of
ecclesial discernment that are used such as the “see, judge, act” approach or the steps of “recognize, interpret, choose.”
i) The contribution that Lectio Divina and different spiritual traditions, ancient and recent, can offer to the practice of discernment should be developed. Indeed, it is appropriate to value the plurality of forms and styles, methods and criteria that the Holy Spirit has suggested over the centuries and that are part of the Church’s spiritual heritage.
Proposals
j) It is proposed that the Churches should experiment with and adapt conversation in the Spirit, and other forms of discernment in ways they may consider appropriate drawing from diverse spiritual traditions relevant to the needs and cultures of their contexts. Appropriate forms of accompaniment can facilitate this practice, helping to grasp its logic and overcome possible resistance.
k) Each local Church is encouraged to equip itself with suitable people trained to facilitate and accompany processes of ecclesial discernment.
l) In order to illuminate ecclesial life, the practice of discernment can usefully be implemented in the pastoral sphere, in a way that is contextually appropriate. This will make it possible to recognise more readily the charisms present in the community, to entrust tasks and ministries wisely. Going beyond the mere planning of activities we will be able
to plan pastoral paths in the light of the Spirit.
3. Entering the Community of Faith: Christian Initiation
Convergences
a) Christian initiation is the journey by which the Lord, through the ministry of the Church,
introduces us to Easter faith and draws us into Trinitarian and ecclesial communion. This
journey takes a variety of forms depending on the age at which it is undertaken and
differing emphases characteristic of Eastern and Western traditions. However, listening to
the Word and conversion of life, liturgical celebration and insertion into the community
and its mission are always intertwined. Precisely for this reason, the catechumenal journey,
with the gradualness of its stages and steps, is the paradigm for every ecclesial experience
of walking together.
b) Initiation brings us into contact with a great variety of vocations and ecclesial ministries.
All of these express the maternal face of a Church, a way of being that teaches its children
to walk by walking with them. It listens to them and, as it responds to their doubts and
questions, is enriched by the newness that each person brings through his or her history,
language and culture. Through this pastoral action, the Christian community encounters
synodality for the first time, often without being fully aware of it.
c) Before any distinction of charisms and ministries, “we were all baptised by one Spirit into
one body” (1Cor. 12:13). Therefore, among all the baptised, there is a genuine equality of
dignity and a common responsibility for mission, according to the vocation of each. By
the anointing of the Spirit, who “teaches all things” (1Jn 2:27), all believers possess an
instinct for the truth of the Gospel, the sensus fidei. This consists in a certain connaturality
with divine realities and the aptitude to grasp what conforms to the truth of faith intuitively.
Synodal processes enhance this gift, allowing the existence of that consensus of the faithful
(consensus fidelium) to be confirmed. This process provides a sure criterion for
determining whether a particular doctrine or practice belongs to the Apostolic faith.
d) The grace of Pentecost abides in the Church through the Sacrament of Confirmation. It
enriches the faithful with the abundance of the gifts of the Spirit. It calls them to develop
their specific vocation, rooted in their common baptismal dignity, in the service of mission.
Its importance requires greater emphasis and it needs to be located in relation to the variety
of charisms and ministries that form the synodal face of the Church.
e) The celebration of the Eucharist, especially on Sunday, is the first and fundamental form
by which the Holy People of God gather and meet. When this is not possible, the
community although desiring the Eucharist gathers to celebrate a Liturgy of the Word. In
the Eucharist, we celebrate a mystery of grace which is given to us. By calling us to
participate in his Body and Blood, the Lord forms us into one body, with one another and
with Himself. Beginning with Paul’s use of the term koinonia (cf. 1 Cor. 10:16-17), the
Christian tradition has treasured the word “communion” to indicate at the same time full
participation in the Eucharist, and, the nature of relationships among the faithful and
among the Churches. While it opens us to the contemplation of the divine life, to the
unfathomable depths of the Trinitarian mystery, this term also refers to the ‘everydayness’
of our relationships: in the simplest gestures by which we open ourselves to one another
the breath of the Spirit genuinely breathes. This is why communion, which springs from
the Eucharist and is celebrated in it, configures and directs the paths of synodality.
f) From the Eucharist we learn to articulate unity and diversity: unity of the Church and
multiplicity of Christian communities; unity of the sacramental mystery and variety of
liturgical traditions; unity of celebration and diversity of vocations, charisms and
ministries. Nothing shows more than the Eucharist that the harmony created by the Spirit
is not uniformity and that every ecclesial gift is intended for common edification.
Matters for Consideration
g) The Sacrament of Baptism cannot be understood in isolation or outside the logic of
Christian initiation, nor can it be understood in an individualistic way. Therefore, we need
to explore further the contribution that a more unified vision of Christian initiation can
make to the understanding of synodality.
h) A mature exercise of the sensus fidei requires not only reception of Baptism but a life lived
in authentic discipleship that develops the grace of Baptism. This enables us to distinguish
the action of the Spirit from merely dominant forms of thinking or cultural conditioning,
or from matters inconsistent with the Gospel. Understanding the exercise of the sensus
fidei is to be deepened with appropriate theological reflection.
i) Reflection on synodality can offer renewed insights into the understanding of
Confirmation, by which the grace of the Spirit articulates the variety of gifts and charisms
in the harmony of Pentecost. In light of different ecclesial experiences, ways to make the
preparation and celebration of this Sacrament more fruitful should be considered, to
awaken in all the faithful the call to community building, mission in the world and witness
to the faith.
j) From a pastoral theological perspective, it is important to continue research into how the
catechumenal way can offer inspiration for other pastoral paths, such as that of marriage
preparation, or accompaniment in choosing professional and social commitments, or
formation for the ordained ministry, in which the whole ecclesial community should be
involved.
Proposals
k) If the Eucharist shapes synodality, then the first step we should take is to celebrate the
Mass in a way that befits the gift, with an authentic sense of friendship in Christ. Liturgy
celebrated with authenticity is the first and fundamental school of discipleship. Its beauty
and simplicity should form us prior to any other organised formation programme.
l) A second step refers to the widely reported need to make liturgical language more
accessible to the faithful and more embodied in the diversity of cultures. Without calling
continuity with tradition and the need for better liturgical formation into question, deeper
reflection is needed. Episcopal Conferences should be entrusted with a wider responsibility
in this regard, according to the Motu Proprio Magnum principium.
m) A third step consists in the pastoral commitment to widen community prayer beyond the
celebration of Mass. Alternative forms of liturgical prayer, as well as practices of popular
piety, in which the distinctiveness of local cultures is reflected, are elements of great
importance in fostering the involvement of all the faithful. They introduce the faithful to
the Christian mystery and bring those less familiar with the Church closer to an encounter
with the Lord. Among the forms of popular piety, Marian devotion stands out because of
its ability to sustain and nourish the faith of many.
4. People in Poverty, Protagonists of the Church’s Journey
Convergences
a) Those in poverty ask the Church for love. By love, they mean respect, acceptance and
recognition, without which providing food, money or social services represents forms of
support that are certainly important but which do not fully take account of the dignity of
the person. Each person needs to be enabled to determine their own means of growth rather
than be the object of the welfare action of others. Being afforded recognition and respect
are powerful ways of enabling this.
b) The preferential option for the poor is implicit in Christological faith: Jesus, poor and
humble, befriended people in poverty, shared a table with them, and denounced the causes
of poverty. For the Church, the preferential option for the poor and those at the margins is
a theological category before being a cultural, sociological, political or philosophical one.
For St. John Paul II, God offers His mercy first to them. This divine preference has
consequences for the lives of all Christians, who are called to nourish “the same mind …
as Jesus Christ” (Phil 2:5).
c) Poverty is not just of one kind. Among the many faces of those in poverty are those who
do not have the things they need to lead a dignified life. There are also migrants and
refugees; indigenous peoples, original and Afro-descendent peoples; those who suffer
violence and abuse, in particular women; people struggling with addiction; minorities who
are systematically denied a voice; abandoned elderly people; victims of racism,
exploitation, and trafficking, especially minors; exploited workers; the economically
excluded, and others living on the peripheries. The most vulnerable of the vulnerable, on
whose behalf constant advocacy is needed, include the unborn and their mothers. The
Assembly hears the cry of the “new poor,” produced by wars and terrorism that plague
many countries on several continents, and the Assembly condemns the corrupt political
and economic systems that cause such strife.
d) Alongside forms of material poverty, many also experience spiritual poverty, understood
as lacking a sense of life’s meaning. An excessive preoccupation with oneself can lead to
seeing others as a threat, which in turn causes us to further turn in on ourselves, expressing
a certain kind of individualism. When the spiritually and materially poor encounter one
another, they begin a journey towards finding answers to each other’s needs. This is a way
of walking together that makes the perspective of the synodal Church concrete, which will
reveal to us the fullest sense of the Gospel beatitude, “Blessed are the poor in spirit” (Mt
5:3).
e) Standing with those who are poor requires engaging with them in caring for our common
home: the cry of the earth and the cry of those living in poverty are the same cry. The lack
of responses to this cry makes the ecological crisis, and climate change in particular, a
threat to the survival of humanity. The Apostolic Exhortation Laudate Deum, published by
Pope Francis to coincide with the opening of the work of the Synod Assembly, emphasises
this. The Church in countries most exposed to the consequences of climate change are
keenly aware of the urgent need to change course, and this represents their contribution to
the journey of other local churches in various parts of the planet.
f) The Church’s commitment must address the causes of poverty and exclusion. This
includes actions to protect the rights of those who are excluded, and this may require public
denunciation of injustices, whether perpetrated by societal structures or by individuals,
corporations or governments. Essential to hearing the voice of those in poverty is listening
to their demands and points of view, and utilising their own words.
g) Christians have a duty to commit themselves to active participation in building up the
common good and defending the dignity of life, drawing inspiration from the Church’s
social doctrine and working together in various ways, through engagement in civil society
organizations, trade unions, popular movements, grassroots associations, in the field of
politics, and so forth. The Church is deeply grateful for them. The community has a duty
to support those who work in these fields in a genuine spirit of charity and service. Their
action is part of the Church’s mission to proclaim the Gospel and bring about the coming
of the Kingdom of God.
h) The Christian community encounters the face and flesh of Christ, who, though he was rich,
became poor for our sake, that we might become rich through his poverty (cf. 2 Cor 8:9).
It is called not only to be close to them, but to learn from them. If becoming synodal means
walking together with the One who is the Way, a synodal Church needs to put those
experiencing poverty at the centre of all aspects of its life: through their sufferings, they
have direct knowledge of the suffering Christ (cf. Evangelii gaudium, no. 198). The
likeness of their lives to that of the Lord makes those who are poor heralds of a salvation
received as a gift and witnesses to the joy of the Gospel.
Matters for Consideration
i) In some parts of the world, the Church is poor, with those who are poor, and for those who
are poor. There is a constant risk, one to be carefully avoided, of viewing those living in
poverty in terms of “them” and “us,” as “objects” of the Church’s charity. Putting those
who experience poverty at the centre and learning from them is something the Church
must do more and more.
j) Prophetic denunciation of situations of injustice, on the one hand, and efforts to persuade
policy makers to act for the common good, which require recourse to diplomacy, on the
other, must be maintained in a dynamic tension so as not to lose a clear focus or
fruitfulness. In particular, care must be taken to ensure that the use of public or private
funds by Church bodies does not limit freedom to speak up for the demands of the Gospel.
k) The provision of services in the fields of education, health care and social welfare, without
discrimination or the exclusion of anyone, is a clear sign of a Church that promotes the
integration and participation of the most vulnerable in Church and society. Organizations
active in this field are encouraged to consider themselves as expressions of the Christian
community and to avoid charity becoming impersonal. They are also urged to network and
coordinate with others.
l) The Church must be honest in examining how it meets the demands of justice among those
who work in its affiliated institutions so as to ensure it acts with consistency and integrity.
m) In a synodal Church, solidarity also manifests itself in the form of an exchange of gifts and
in sharing resources between local churches from different regions. These relationships
foster the unity of the Church by creating bonds between the Christian communities
involved. There is a need to focus on the conditions necessary to ensured that priests who
come to the aid of churches needing clergy are not providing merely a functional solution
but represent a resource for the growth both of the Church that sends them and the Church
that receives them. Similarly, it is necessary to ensure that economic aid does not
degenerate into the mere provision of welfare, but also promotes authentic evangelical
solidarity and is managed transparently and reliably.
Proposals
n) The Church’s social doctrine is a too little-known resource. This needs to be addressed.
Local churches are invited not only to make its contents better known but to foster its
reception through practices that put its inspiration into action.
o) The experience of encounter, sharing a common life and serving those living in poverty
and on the margins should be an integral part of all formation paths offered by Christian
communities: it is a requirement of faith, not an optional extra. This is especially true for
candidates for ordained ministry and consecrated life.
p) As part of the rethinking of diaconal ministry, the Church should promote a stronger
orientation towards service to those who are poor.
q) Church teaching, liturgy, and practice must more explicitly and carefully integrate the
biblical and theological foundations of integral ecology.
5. A Church “out of every tribe, tongue, people and nation”
Convergences
a) Christians live in specific cultures, bringing Christ to them in Word and Sacrament,
engaging in the service of charity with humility and joy, receiving the mystery of Christ
that already awaits us in every place and time. In this way we become a Church that
welcomes people from “every tribe, tongue, people and nation” (Rev. 5:9).
b) The cultural, historical, and continental contexts in which the Church is present reveal
different spiritual and material needs. This shapes the culture of the local churches, their
missionary priorities, the concerns and gifts that each of them brings to the synodal
dialogue, and the languages with which they express themselves. During the days of the
Assembly, we were able to experience directly, and mostly joyfully, the diverse
expressions of being Church.
c) Churches live in increasingly multicultural and multireligious contexts. This necessitates
finding ways to create dialogue between religions and cultures, with which Christians
should engage alongside the many groups that compose a society. Living the Church’s
mission in these contexts requires a style of presence, service and proclamation that seeks
to build bridges, cultivate mutual understanding and engage in evangelisation that
accompanies, listens and learns. In the Assembly the image of “taking off one’s shoes” to
cross the threshold towards encounter with the other resonated as a sign of humility and
respect for a sacred space, on an equal footing.
d) Migration reshapes local churches as cross-cultural communities. Migrants and refugees,
many of whom bear the wounds of uprooting, war and violence, often become a source of
renewal and enrichment for the communities that welcome them and an opportunity to
establish direct links with geographically distant churches. In the face of increasingly
hostile attitudes toward migrants, we are called to practice an open welcome, to
accompany them in the construction of a new life and to build a true intercultural
communion among peoples. Respect for the liturgical traditions and religious practices of
migrants is an integral part of an authentic welcome.
e) Missionaries have given their lives to carry the Good News to the whole world. Their
commitment is a great testimony to the power of the Gospel. However, particular attention
and sensitivity are needed in contexts where “mission” is a word laden with painful
historical memories that hinders communion today. In some places, the proclamation of
the Gospel was associated with colonization, even genocide. Evangelising in these
contexts requires acknowledging mistakes made, learning a new sensitivity to these issues,
and accompanying a generation seeking to forge Christian identities beyond colonialism.
Respect and humility are fundamental attitudes needed to recognise that we complement
each other and that encounters with different cultures can enrich the living and thinking of
the faith of Christian communities.
f) The Church teaches the need for and encourages the practice of interreligious dialogue as
part of building communion among all peoples. In a world of violence and fragmentation,
a witness is ever more urgent to the unity of humanity, its common origin and common
destiny, in a coordinated and reciprocal solidarity toward social justice, peace,
reconciliation and care for our common home. The Church is aware that the Spirit can
speak through women and men of every religion, belief and culture.
Matters for Consideration
g) We need to cultivate a greater sensitivity towards the riches of our diverse expressions of
being Church. This requires a search for a dynamic balance between the dimension of the
Church as a whole and its local rootedness, between respect for the bond of Church unity
and the risk of homogenization that stifles variety. Meanings and priorities vary among
different contexts, and this requires identifying and fostering forms of decentralization.
h) The Church too is affected by polarization and distrust in vital matters such as liturgical
life and moral, social and theological reflection. We need to recognize the causes of each
through dialogue and undertake courageous processes of revitalizing communion and
processes of reconciliation to overcome them.
i) In our local churches, we sometimes experience tensions between different ways of
understanding evangelisation: emphasis on a witness of life, commitment to human
advancement, dialogue with faiths and cultures, and explicit proclamation of the Gospel.
Equally, a tension emerges between the explicit proclamation of Jesus Christ and valuing
the characteristics of each culture in search of the Gospel traits (semina Verbi) it already
contains.
j) Possible confusion between the Gospel’s message and the culture of those engaged in
evangelisation was mentioned as one of the issues to be explored.
k) Increasing conflicts, with the trade and use of increasingly powerful weapons, opens up
the question, raised in several groups, of more reflection and formation in order that we
can manage conflicts in a non-violent way. This is a valuable contribution that Christians
can offer to today’s world in dialogue and collaboration with other religions.
Proposals
l) Renewed attention is needed to the question of the languages we use to speak to people’s
minds and hearts in a wide diversity of contexts in a way that is both beautiful and
accessible.
m) We need a shared framework for managing and evaluating experimentations with forms of
decentralisation, identifying all the actors involved and their roles. For the sake of
coherence, discernment processes regarding decentralisation must take place in a synodal
style, envisaging the concurrence and contribution of all actors involved at different levels.
n) New paradigms are needed for pastoral engagement with indigenous peoples, taking the
form of a common journey and not an action done to them or for them. Their participation
in decision-making processes at all levels can contribute to a more vibrant and missionary
Church.
o) From the work of the Assembly, there is a call for better knowledge of the teachings of
Vatican II, post-conciliar teaching and the Church’s social doctrine. We need to know our
different traditions better in order to be more clearly a Church of Churches in communion,
effective in service and dialogue.
p) In a world where the number of migrants and refugees is increasing while the willingness
to welcome them is decreasing and where the foreigner is viewed with increasing
suspicion, it is appropriate for the Church to engage decisively in education, in the culture
of dialogue and encounter, combating racism and xenophobia, especially through pastoral
formation. Equally, it is necessary to engage in concrete projects for the integration of
migrants.
q) We recommend continued engagement in dialogue and discernment regarding racial
justice. Systems within the Church that create or maintain racial injustice need to be
identified and addressed. Processes for healing and reconciliation should be created, with
the help of those harmed, to eradicate the sin of racism.
6. The Eastern Churches and Latin Church Traditions
Convergences
a) Among the Eastern Churches those in full communion with the Successor of Peter enjoy
a liturgical, theological, ecclesiological and canonical distinctiveness that greatly enriches
the whole Church. In particular, their experience of unity in diversity can make a valuable
contribution to the understanding and practice of synodality.
b) Throughout history, the level of autonomy granted to these Churches has gone through
different phases. Some customs and procedures are now considered outdated, such as
Latinization. In recent decades, the path of recognizing the specificity, distinction and
autonomy of these Churches has developed considerably.
c) The substantial migration of faithful from the Catholic East into Latin-majority territories
raises important pastoral questions. If the current pattern continues or increases, there may
be more members of the Eastern Catholic Churches in diaspora than in canonical
territories. For several reasons, the establishment of Eastern hierarchies in the countries of
immigration is not sufficient to address the problem, but there is a need for the local Latinrite Churches, in the name of synodality, to help the Eastern faithful who have emigrated
to preserve their identity and cultivate their specific heritage, without undergoing
processes of assimilation.
Matters for Consideration
d) We suggest further study of the contribution that the experience of the Eastern Catholic
Churches can make to the understanding and practice of synodality.
e) Some difficulties remain regarding the Pope’s role in giving his assent to bishops elected
by the Synods of the Churches sui iuris for their territory and the papal appointment of
bishops outside canonical territory. The request to extend the jurisdiction of the Patriarchs
outside the Patriarchal territories is also a matter for discernment and dialogue with the
Holy See.
f) In regions where the faithful of different Catholic Churches are present, we need to find
models that render visible effective forms of unity in diversity.
g) We need to reflect on the contribution that the Eastern Catholic Churches can make to
Christian unity and their role in interreligious and intercultural dialogues.
Proposals
h) First and foremost, the request emerged to establish a permanent Council of the Patriarchs
and Major Archbishops of the Eastern Catholic Churches to the Holy Father.
i) Some requested to convoke a Special Synod dedicated to the Eastern Catholic Churches,
their identity and mission, as well addressing pastoral and canonical challenges in the
context of war and massive migration.
j) We need to establish a joint commission of Eastern and Latin theologians, historians and
canonists to address issues requiring further study and formulate proposals pointing a way
forward.
k) There needs to be adequate representation of members of the Eastern Catholic Churches
in the dicasteries of the Roman Curia to enrich the whole Church with their perspectives,
to help address problems as they arise and to enable their participation in dialogue at the
various different levels.
l) To foster forms of reception that respect the heritage of the faithful of the Eastern
Churches, we need to intensify relations between Eastern clergy in diaspora and Latin
clergy to deepen mutual knowledge and recognition of the respective Traditions
7. On the Road Towards Christian Unity
Convergences
a) This session of the Synodal Assembly opened with a profound ecumenical gesture. The
“Together” prayer vigil saw the presence of numerous other leaders and representatives of
different Christian communions alongside Pope Francis, a clear and credible sign of the
will to walk together in the spirit of unity of faith and exchange of gifts. This highly
significant event also allowed us to recognize that we are in an ecumenical kairos and to
reaffirm that what unites us is greater than what divides us. For in common we have “one
Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all, who is over all, among all and in
all” (Eph. 4:5-6).
b) Baptism, which is at the root of the principle of synodality, also constitutes the foundation
of ecumenism. Through it, all Christians participate in the sensus fidei and for this reason
they should be listened to carefully, regardless of their tradition, as the Synod Assembly
did in its discernment process. There can be no synodality without an ecumenical
dimension.
c) Ecumenism is first and foremost a matter of spiritual renewal that also requires processes
for repentance and healing of memory. The Assembly was moved to hear testimonies of
Christians of different ecclesial traditions who share friendship, prayer and above all a
commitment to the service of those experiencing poverty. Dedication to the least of these
cements bonds and helps us focus on what already unites all believers in Christ. Therefore,
it is important that ecumenism is practised first and foremost in daily life. In theological
and institutional dialogue, the patient weaving of mutual understanding continues in an
atmosphere of growing trust and openness.
d) In not a few regions of the world there is an “ecumenism of blood”, stemming from
Christians of different affiliations who give their lives for faith in Jesus Christ. The
testimony of their martyrdom is more eloquent than any words. Unity comes from the
Cross of the Lord.
e) Collaboration among all Christians is crucial in addressing the pastoral challenges of our
time. In secularized societies, this enables the voice of the Gospel to have greater force. In
contexts of poverty, it impels people to join forces in the service of justice, peace and the
dignity of the least. In all instances, it is a resource for healing the culture of hatred,
division and war that pits groups, peoples and nations against each other.
f) Marriages between Christians who belong to different Churches or ecclesial communities
(inter-church marriages) may constitute realities in which the wisdom of communion can
mature, and it is possible to evangelize each other.
Matters for Consideration
g) Our assembly was able to perceive the diverse ways different Christian traditions
understand the synodal configuration of the Church. In Orthodox Churches, synodality is
understood in a strict sense as an expression of the collegial exercise of authority proper
to the bishops alone (the Holy Synod). Broadly, it refers to the active participation of all
the faithful in the life and mission of the Church. There were some references to practices
in other ecclesial communities, enriching our debates. All this requires further
investigation.
h) Another theme to be explored concerns the link between synodality and primacy at the
various levels (local, regional, universal) in their mutual interdependence. We need a
shared re-reading of history in order to overcome stereotypes and prejudices. Ongoing
ecumenical dialogues have provided a better understanding, in light of the practices of the
first millennium, of the fact that synodality and primacy are related, complementary and
inseparable realities. The clarification of this delicate point has consequences for the way
of understanding the Petrine ministry in the service of unity, according to what St. John
Paul II wished for in the encyclical Ut unum sint.
i) We need to examine the issue of Eucharistic hospitality (Communicatio in sacris) from
theological, canonical and pastoral perspectives in light of the link between sacramental
and ecclesial communion. This issue is of particular importance to inter-church couples. It
raises the need for a broader reflection on inter-church marriages.
j) Reflection was also urged on the phenomenon of “non-denominational” communities and
Christian-inspired “revival” movements, which are also joined in large numbers by faithful
who were originally Catholic.
Proposals
k) The year 2025 marks the anniversary of the Council of Nicaea (325) at which the symbol
of the faith that unites all Christians was elaborated. A common commemoration of this
event will help us to better understand how in the past controversial questions were
discussed and resolved together in Council.
l) In the same year, 2025, providentially, the date of the solemnity of Easter will coincide for
all Churches and Christian communities. The Assembly expressed a keen desire to come
to a common date for the feast of Easter so that we can celebrate the Resurrection of the
Lord, our life and our salvation, on the same day.
m) There is also a desire to continue to involve Christians of other Churches and ecclesial
traditions in Catholic synodal processes at all levels and to invite more fraternal delegates
to the next session of the Assembly in 2024.
n) A proposal has been put forward by some to convene an ecumenical Synod on common
mission in the contemporary world.
o) It was also proposed that we might devise an ecumenical martyrology.
PART II – ALL DISCIPLES, ALL MISSIONARIES
8. Church is Mission
Convergences
a) Rather than saying that the Church has a mission, we affirm that Church ‘is’ mission. “As
the Father has sent me, so I send you” (John 20:21): the Church receives from Christ, the
One who is sent by the Father, Her own mission. Supported and guided by the Holy Spirit,
the Church announces and witnesses the Gospel to those who do not know it or welcome
it. They do this with that preferential option for the poor that is rooted in the mission of
Jesus. In this way the Church co-operates in the coming of the Reign of God, of which She
is the seed (cf. LG 5).
b) The sacraments of Christian initiation confer on all the disciples of Jesus the responsibility
for the mission of the Church. Laymen and laywomen, those in consecrated life, and
ordained ministers have equal dignity. They have received different charisms and vocations
and exercise different roles and functions, but all are called and nourished by the Holy
Spirit to form one body in Christ (1 Cor. 4-31). They are all disciples, all missionaries, in
the reciprocal vitality of local communities who experience the delightful and comforting
joy of evangelizing. The exercise of co-responsibility is essential for synodality and is
necessary at all levels of the Church. Each Christian is a mission on this earth.
c) The family is the pillar of every Christian community. Parents and grandparents and all
those who live and share their faith in the family are the first missionaries. The family, as
a community of life and love, is a privileged place of education in faith and Christian
practice, one that needs special accompaniment within communities. Support is especially
needed for parents who must reconcile work, including within the Church community and
in service to its mission, with the demands of family life.
d) If the mission is a grace involving all the Church, the lay faithful contribute in a vital way
to advancing that mission in all areas and in the ordinary situations of every day. Above
all, it is they who make the Church present and who proclaim the Gospel, for example, in
digital culture, which has such a strong impact throughout the world; in youth culture; in
the world of work and business, politics, and the arts and culture; in scientific research,
education, and training; in the care of our common home; and especially through
participation in public life. Wherever they are present, they are called to witness to Jesus
Christ in daily life and to explicitly share the faith with others. In a special way, young
people, with their gifts and fragilities, growing in friendship with Jesus, become apostles
of the Gospel to their peers.
e) The lay faithful are also increasingly present and active in service within Christian
communities. Many of them organize and animate pastoral communities, serve as religious
educators, theologians and formators, spiritual animators and catechists, and participate in
various parish and diocesan bodies. In many regions, the life of Christian communities and
the mission of the Church depends upon catechists. In addition, lay people serve in
safeguarding and administration. All of these contributions are indispensable to the
mission of the Church; for this reason, the acquisition of necessary competences should be
provided for.
f) In their immense variety, the charisms of the laity represent distinct gifts to the Church
from the Holy Spirit that must be called forth, recognized, and fully appreciated. In some
situations, the laity may be called to help make up for the shortage of priests, with the
danger that the lay character of their apostolate risks being diminished. In other contexts,
it may be that priests do everything themselves and thus the charisms and ministries of the
laity are ignored or underutilized. In all contexts, there is a danger, that was expressed by
many at the Assembly, of “clericalizing” the laity, creating a kind of lay elite that
perpetuates inequalities and divisions among the People of God.
g) The mission ad gentes is mutually enriching for the Churches, because it not only involves
the missionaries themselves but the entire community, which in this way is inspired to
prayer, the sharing of goods, and witness. Churches lacking clergy should not give up this
commitment, while those with more vocations to the ordained ministry benefit from
cooperating pastorally in a genuinely evangelical manner. All the missionaries — laymen
and women, those in consecrated life, deacons and priests, and particularly the members
of missionary institutes and fidei donum missionaries — are an important resource for
creating bonds of knowledge and exchange of gifts.
h) The Church’s mission is continually renewed and nourished by the Eucharist, particularly
when its communal and missionary nature is fully expressed.
Matters for Consideration
i) There is a need to continue to deepen the theological understanding of the relationships
between charisms and ministries in a missionary key.
j) Vatican II and subsequent magisterial teaching present the distinctive mission of the laity
in terms of the sanctification of temporal or secular realities. However, the reality is that
pastoral practice at the parish, diocesan and, recently, even universal levels, increasingly
entrusts lay people with tasks and ministries within the Church itself. Theological
reflection and canonical provisions need to be reconciled with these important
developments and to avoid dualisms that could compromise the perception of the unity of
the Church’s mission.
k) In the promotion of the co-responsibility of all the baptized for mission we recognize the
apostolic capacities of persons with disabilities. We want to better value the contribution
to evangelisation offered by the immense richness of their humanity. We recognise their
experiences of suffering, marginalisation and discrimination, sometimes occurring even
within the Christian community.
l) Pastoral structures need to be re-organized so they can readily recognise, call forth, and
animate lay charisms and ministries, inserting them into the missionary dynamism of the
synodal Church. Under the guidance of their pastors, the communities will be able to send
people as well as sustain those they have sent on mission. In this way, these structures will
primarily be at the service of the mission that the faithful carry out within society, in the
family, and in work life, rather than focusing exclusively on internal matters or
organisational concerns.
m) The expression “an all-ministerial Church,” used in the Instrumentum laboris, can lend
itself to misunderstanding. Its meaning will have to be clarified in order to remove any
ambiguities.
Proposals
n) We need more creativity in establishing ministries according to the needs of local churches,
with the particular involvement of the young. One can think of further expanding
responsibilities assigned to the existing ministry of lector, responsibilities that are already
broader than those performed in the liturgy. This could become a fuller ministry of the
Word of God, which, in appropriate contexts, could also include preaching. We could also
explore the possibility of establishing a ministry assigned to married couples committed
to supporting family life and accompanying people preparing for the Sacrament of
Marriage.
o) Local churches are invited to consider appropriate means and moments of
acknowledgment by the community of lay charisms and ministries. This could happen on
the occasion of a liturgical celebration in which the pastoral mandate is bestowed.
9. Women in the Life and Mission of the Church
Convergences
a) We are created, male and female, in the image and likeness of God. From the beginning,
creation manifests unity and difference, bestowing on women and men a shared nature,
calling, and destiny, and two distinct experiences of being human. Sacred Scripture
testifies to the complementarity and reciprocity of women and men, and to the covenant
between them that lies at the heart of God’s design for creation. Jesus considered women
his interlocutors: he spoke with them about the Kingdom of God; he welcomed them as
disciples, as for example Mary of Bethany. These women, who experienced His power of
healing, liberation and recognition, travelled with Him on the road from Galilee to
Jerusalem (Lk 8,1-3). He entrusted the announcement of the Resurrection on Easter
morning to a woman, Mary Magdalene.
b) In Christ, women and men are clothed with the same baptismal dignity (Gal 3:28) and
receive equally the variety of gifts of the Spirit. We are called together into a communion
of loving, non-competitive relationships in Christ, and to a co-responsibility to be
expressed at every level of the Church’s life. We are, as Pope Francis said to us together,
“a people convened and called with the strength of the Beatitudes”.
c) We have had a very positive experience of the reciprocity between women and men during
this Assembly. Together we echo the call made in the previous phases of the synodal
process, that the Church adopt a more decisive commitment to understand and accompany
women from a pastoral and sacramental point of view. Women desire to share their
spiritual experience of journeying towards holiness in the various stages of life: as young
women, as mothers, in their friendships and relationships, in family life at all ages, in
working life, and in consecrated life. Women cry out for justice in societies still marked
by sexual violence, economic inequality and the tendency to treat them as objects. Women
are scarred by trafficking, forced migration and war. Pastoral accompaniment and vigorous
advocacy for women should go hand in hand.
d) Women make up most of those in our pews and are often the first missionaries of the faith
in the family. Consecrated women, both in contemplative and apostolic life, are a
fundamental and distinctive gift, sign and witness in our midst. The long history of women
missionaries, saints, theologians and mystics is also a powerful source of nourishment and
inspiration for women and men today.
e) Mary of Nazareth, woman of faith and Mother of God, remains for all a unique source of
theological, ecclesial and spiritual meaning. Mary reminds us of the universal call to listen
attentively to God and to remain open to the Holy Spirit. She knew the joy of bearing and
nurturing and endured pain and suffering. She gave birth in impoverished conditions,
became a refugee and lived the sorrow of her Son’s brutal killing, but she also knew the
magnificence of his Resurrection and the glory of Pentecost.
f) Many women expressed deep gratitude for the work of priests and bishops. They also
spoke of a Church that wounds. Clericalism, a chauvinist mentality and inappropriate
expressions of authority continue to scar the face of the Church and damage its
communion. A profound spiritual conversion is needed as the foundation for any effective
structural change. Sexual abuse and the abuse of power and authority continue to cry out
for justice, healing and reconciliation. We asked how the Church can be a place that
safeguards all.
g) Where dignity and justice are undermined in relationships between men and women in the
Church, we weaken the credibility of our proclamation to the world. Our synodal path
shows the need for relational renewal and structural changes. In this way we can better
welcome the participation and contribution of all – with lay and consecrated women and
men, deacons, priests, and bishops – as co-responsible disciples in the work of mission.
h) The Assembly asks that we avoid repeating the mistake of talking about women as an issue
or a problem. Instead, we desire to promote a Church in which men and women dialogue
together, in order to understand more deeply the horizon of God’s project, that sees them
together as protagonists, without subordination, exclusion and competition.
Matters for Consideration
i) Churches all over the world have expressed a clear request that the active contribution of
women would be recognised and valued, and that their pastoral leadership increase in all
areas of the Church’s life and mission. In order to give better expression to the gifts and
charisms of all and to be more responsive to pastoral needs, how can the Church include
more women in existing roles and ministries? If new ministries are required, who should
discern these, at what levels and in what ways?
j) Different positions have been expressed regarding women’s access to the diaconal
ministry. For some, this step would be unacceptable because they consider it a
discontinuity with Tradition. For others, however, opening access for women to the
diaconate would restore the practice of the Early Church. Others still, discern it as an
appropriate and necessary response to the signs of the times, faithful to the Tradition, and
one that would find an echo in the hearts of many who seek new energy and vitality in the
Church. Some express concern that the request speaks of a worrying anthropological
confusion, which, if granted, would marry the Church to the spirit of the age.
k) Discussion of this question is also related to the wider ongoing reflection on the theology
of the diaconate (cf. below Chapter 11).
Proposals
l) Local churches are encouraged to extend their work of listening, accompaniment and care
to the most marginalised women in their social contexts.
m) It is urgent to ensure that women can participate in decision-making processes and assume
roles of responsibility in pastoral care and ministry. The Holy Father has significantly
increased the number of women in positions of responsibility in the Roman Curia. This
should also happen at other levels of Church life, in consecrated life and dioceses.
Provision needs to be made in Canon Law accordingly.
n) Theological and pastoral research on the access of women to the diaconate should be
continued, benefiting from consideration of the results of the commissions specially
established by the Holy Father, and from the theological, historical and exegetical research
already undertaken. If possible, the results of this research should be presented to the next
Session of the Assembly.
o) Cases of labour injustice and unfair remuneration within the Church need to be addressed
especially for women in consecrated life, who are too often treated as cheap labour.
p) Women’s access to formation programmes and theological study needs to be considerably
expanded. We suggest that women should also be integrated into seminary teaching and
training programs to foster better formation for ordained ministry.
q) There is a need to ensure that liturgical texts and Church documents are more attentive to
the use of language that takes into equal consideration both men and women, and also
includes a range of words, images and narratives that draw more widely on women’s
experience.
r) We propose that women receive appropriate formation to enable them to be judges in all
canonical processes.
10. Consecrated Life and Lay Associations and Movements: ACharismatic Sign
Convergences
a) The Church has always benefitted from the gift of charisms, be it from the most
extraordinary to the simplest. Through them the Holy Spirit rejuvenates and renews the
Church with joy and gratitude. The Holy People of God recognise in these charisms the
providential help with which God sustains, directs and illuminates His mission.
b) The Church’s charismatic dimension is made manifest in the rich and varied forms of
consecrated life. This testimony has contributed to renewing the life of the ecclesial
community in every age and provides an antidote to the perennial temptation towards
worldliness. The diverse families that compose religious life demonstrate the beauty of
discipleship and holiness in Christ, whether in their distinctive forms of prayer, their
service among the people, whether through forms of community life, the solitude of the
contemplative life or at the frontier of new cultures. Those in consecrated life have often
been the first to sense important historical changes and to heed the promptings of the Spirit.
Today, too, the Church needs their prophetic voice and action. The Christian community
also recognises and wishes to be attentive to the practices of synodal life and discernment
that have been tried and tested in communities of consecrated life, maturing over the
centuries. We know that we can learn from them wisdom in how to walk the synodal path.
Many Congregations and Institutes practice conversation in the Spirit or similar forms of
discernment in the conduct of provincial and general chapters, in order to renew structures,
rethink lifestyles, and activate innovative forms of service and proximity to the poorest. In
other cases, however, we find the persistence of an authoritarian style, which makes no
room for dialogue.
c) With equal gratitude, the People of God recognize the seeds of renewal in communities
with a long history that has blossomed into new ecclesial communities. Lay associations,
ecclesial movements and new communities are a precious sign of the maturation of the coresponsibility of all the baptized. They hold particular value because of their experience in
promoting communion among different vocations, the impetus with which they proclaim
the Gospel, their proximity to those on the margins economically and socially and through
their promotion of the common good. They are often models of synodal communion and
of participation for mission.
d) Cases of abuse of various kinds experienced by those in religious life and members of lay
associations, especially of women, signal a problem in the exercise of authority and
demand decisive and appropriate interventions.
Matters for Consideration
e) The Church’s magisterium has a well-developed body of teaching on the importance of
both hierarchical and charismatic gifts in the life and mission of the Church. This calls for
growth in ecclesial understanding and in theological reflection. It is therefore worth
considering anew the ecclesiological significance and concrete pastoral implications of
this teaching.
f) The variety of charismatic expressions in the Church underscores the People of God’s
commitment to being a prophetic presence in proximity to the least of our sisters and
brothers, and to providing contemporary culture with a deeper sense of the spiritual aspects
of life. There is a need to develop a more profound understanding of how consecrated life,
as well as lay associations, ecclesial movements, and new communities, place their
charisms at the service of communion and mission in local churches, augmenting existing
paths towards holiness with a presence that is prophetic.
Proposals
g) We believe the time has come for a revision of the 1978 document Mutuae relationes,
regarding the relationships between bishops and religious in the Church. We propose that
this revision be completed in a synodal manner, consulting all involved.
h) To the same end, it is necessary to put in place, in a synodal spirit, means and instruments
for promoting encounters and forms of collaboration between Episcopal Conferences and
the Conferences of Superiors and Major Superiors of Institutes of Consecrated Life and
Societies of Apostolic Life.
i) At the level of both individual local churches and groupings of Churches, the promotion
of missionary synodality requires the establishment and configuration of councils and
advisory bodies at which representatives of lay associations and ecclesial movements and
new communities can meet in order to foster enduring relationships between their life and
work and that of the local churches.
j) In theological formation at all levels, above all in the formation of ordained ministers, the
prominence given to the Church’s charismatic dimension should be monitored and
strengthened where necessary.
11. Deacons and Priests in a Synodal Church
Convergences
a) Priests are the principal collaborators of the bishop, forming with him one presbyterate (cf
LG 28). Deacons are ordained for the ministry of serving the People of God in the diakonia
of the Word, in the liturgy, but above all in the exercise of charity (cf LG 29). The Synodal
Assembly wishes, first and foremost, to express to priests and deacons a deep sense of
gratitude. Aware that they may experience loneliness and isolation, it encourages Christian
communities to support them with prayer, friendship, and collaboration.
b) Deacons and priests engage in ministry in a wide variety of pastoral settings: in parishes,
in evangelisation, among those living in poverty and who are marginalized, in the world
of culture and education, as well as in the mission ad gentes, in theological research, at
retreat centres and places of spiritual renewal, and many others. In a synodal Church,
ordained ministers are called to live their service to the People of God in a disposition of
proximity to people, welcoming and listening to all, while cultivating a deep personal
spirituality and a life of prayer. Above all, they are required to reconsider the exercise of
authority, modelling it upon Jesus, who, “though he was in the form of God, […] emptied
himself, taking the form of a slave” (Phil. 2:6-7). The Assembly acknowledges that through
their dedication many priests and deacons make Christ, the Good Shepherd and the
Servant, present.
c) One obstacle to ministry and mission is clericalism. Clericalism stems from a
misunderstanding of the divine call, viewing it more as a privilege than a service, and
manifesting itself in the exercise of power in a worldly manner that refuses to allow itself
to be accountable. This distortion of the priestly vocation needs to be challenged from the
earliest stages of formation by ensuring close contact with the People of God and through
concrete service-learning experiences among those most in need. The exercise of priestly
ministry today cannot be conceived of except in harmony with the bishop and the
presbyterate, and in profound communion with other ministries and charisms.
Unfortunately, clericalism is a disposition that can manifest itself not only among ministers
but also among the laity.
d) In order to exercise ordained ministry in a context of co-responsibility, it is necessary to
be aware of one’s own capacities and limitations. For this reason, it is important to ensure
that a realistic approach to human formation is integrated with the cultural and spiritual
dimensions of formation, as well as formation for discipleship. In this regard, the
contribution of families of origin, and the Christian community, within which a young
man’s vocation is fostered, as well as that of other families that accompany his growth,
cannot be underestimated.
Matters for Consideration
e) Within the context of the formation of all the baptised for service in a synodal Church, the
formation of deacons and priests requires special attention. The request has been widely
expressed at this Assembly that seminaries and other programmes of priestly formation
remain connected to the daily life of the community. We need to avoid the risks of
formalism and ideology that lead to authoritarian attitudes, and impede genuine vocational
growth. Revision to programmes of formation requires extensive discussion and
consideration.
f) Different opinions have been expressed about priestly celibacy. Its value is appreciated by
all as richly prophetic and a profound witness to Christ; some ask, however, whether its
appropriateness, theologically, for priestly ministry should necessarily translate into a
disciplinary obligation in the Latin Church, above all in ecclesial and cultural contexts that
make it more difficult. This discussion is not new but requires further consideration.
Proposals
g) In the Latin Churches the permanent diaconate has been implemented in differing ways in
different ecclesial contexts. Some local churches have not introduced it at all; in others,
there is concern that deacons are perceived as a kind of substitute for the shortage of
priests. Sometimes, their ministry finds expression in the liturgy rather than in service to
those living in poverty and who are needy in the community. We therefore recommend an
assessment of how the diaconal ministry has been implemented since Vatican II.
h) From the theological point of view, there is a need to understand the diaconate first and
foremost in itself and not only as a stage of access to the presbyterate. Qualifying the
primary form of the diaconate as “permanent,” to distinguish it from the “transitional”
form, is itself an indication of a change of perspective that has not yet been adequately
realized.
i) The uncertainties surrounding the theology of the diaconate are related to the fact that it
has only been restored to a distinct and permanent hierarchical ministry in the Latin Church
since the Second Vatican Council. Deeper study will shed light on the question of the
access of women to the diaconate.
j) A thorough review of formation for ordained ministry in view of the missionary and
synodal dimensions of the Church is called for. This means also reviewing the Ratio
fundamentalis that determines how formation is structured. We also recommend at the
same time ensuring the adoption of a synodal style when it comes to the ongoing formation
of priests and deacons.
k) Transparency and a culture of accountability are of crucial importance for us to move
forward in building a synodal Church. We ask local churches to identify processes and
structures that allow for a regular audit of how priests and deacons are carrying out roles
of responsibility in the exercise of their ministry. Existing institutions, such as participatory
bodies or pastoral visits, can be the starting point for this work, taking care to involve the
community. Such forms must be adapted to local contexts and diverse cultures, so as not
to be a hindrance or a bureaucratic burden. The discernment of the kind of process required
could be considered at the regional or continental level.
l) On a case-by-case basis, and in accordance with the context, the possibility should be
considered of re-inserting priests who have left the ministry in pastoral services that
recognise their formation and experience.
12. The Bishop in Ecclesial Communion
Convergences
a) According to Vatican II, bishops, as successors of the Apostles, are placed at the service
of the communion that is realised in the local Church, among the Churches and with the
entire Church. The figure of the bishop can therefore adequately be understood only in the
web of relations that is woven from the portion of the People of God entrusted to him, the
presbyterate and the deacons, consecrated persons, and the other bishops, and the Bishop
of Rome, and taking account of a constant orientation toward mission.
b) The bishop is, in his Church, the one primarily responsible for proclaiming the Gospel and
for the liturgy. He guides the Christian community and promotes pastoral care of those
experiencing poverty and defence of the most vulnerable. As the visible principle of unity,
he has, in particular, the task of discerning and coordinating the different charisms and
ministries sent forth by the Spirit for the proclamation of the Gospel and the common good
of the community. This ministry is realized in a synodal manner when governance is
accompanied by co-responsibility, preaching by listening to the faithful People of God,
and sanctification and celebration of the liturgy by humility and conversion.
c) The bishop has an indispensable role in vivifying and animating the synodal process in the
local Church, promoting the mutuality between “all, some and one”. The “one” Episcopal
ministry values the participation of “all” the faithful, through the contribution of “some”
who are more directly involved in discernment and decision-making processes. The
conviction with which the bishop himself adopts a synodal approach and the style by which
he exercises authority will influence decisively how priests and deacons, lay men and
women, and those in consecrated life, participate in the synodal process. The bishop is
called to be an example of synodality for all.
d) In contexts where the Church is perceived as the family of God, the bishop is regarded as
a father to all; there is, however, a crisis in regard to how his authority is experienced in
secularised societies. It is important not to lose sight of the sacramental nature of the
Episcopate, lest the figure of the bishop be assimilated into that of a civil authority figure.
e) Expectations of bishops are often very high, and many bishops spoke of feeling
overburdened with administrative and legal commitments, which makes it difficult for
them to fully realize their mission. The bishop also must come to terms with his own frailty
and limitations and sometimes lacks the support he needs, whether human or spiritual. A
certain sense of loneliness is not uncommon. That is why it is important, on the one hand,
to refocus on elements that are essential to the mission of the bishop, and, on the other
hand, to cultivate authentic fraternity among bishops themselves and among bishops and
their priests.
Matters for Consideration
f) On the theological level, the significance of the reciprocal relationship between the bishop
and the local Church needs to be significantly deepened. He is called, both to guide his
local Church, and, at the same time, to recognise and preserve the richness of its history,
traditions and charisms.
g) The question of the relationship between the Sacrament of Holy Orders and jurisdiction
needs to be studied in greater depth. In dialogue with Lumen Gentium and more recent
teachings such as the Apostolic Constitution Praedicate Evangelium, the aim of such a
study would be to clarify the theological and canonical criteria underlying the principle of
the shared responsibility of the bishop and to determine the scope, forms and implications
of co-responsibility.
h) Some bishops express discomfort when they are asked to speak on matters of faith and
morals where full agreement within the Episcopate is lacking. Further reflection is needed
on the relationship between episcopal collegiality and diversity of theological and pastoral
views.
i) Integral to a synodal Church is ensuring a culture of transparency and respect for the
procedures established for the protection of minors and vulnerable people. It is necessary
to develop further structures dedicated to the prevention of abuse. The sensitive issue of
handling abuse places many bishops in the difficult situation of having to reconcile the
role of father with that of judge. The appropriateness of assigning the judicial task to
another body, to be specified canonically, should be explored.
Proposals
j) It is necessary to implement, in forms legally yet to be defined, structures and processes
for regular review of the bishop’s performance, with reference to the style of his authority,
the economic administration of the diocese’s assets, and the functioning of participatory
bodies, and safeguarding against all possible kinds of abuse. A culture of accountability is
an integral part of a synodal Church that promotes co-responsibility, as well as
safeguarding against abuses.
k) There are calls to make the Episcopal Council (can. 473 §4), the Diocesan Pastoral Council
and the Eparchial Pastoral Council (CIC can. 511, CCEO can 272) mandatory, and to make
the diocesan bodies exercising co-responsibility more operational, including in legal terms.
l) The Assembly calls for a review of the criteria for selecting candidates for the episcopate,
balancing the authority of the Apostolic Nuncio with participation of Episcopal
Conferences. There are also requests to expand consultation with the faithful People of
God, and to involve a greater number of lay people and consecrated persons in the
consultation process, taking care to avoid being put under any undue pressure in the
selection process.
m) Many bishops express the need to rethink the functioning and strengthen the structure of
the metropolitan sees (ecclesiastical provinces) and regions, so that they can become
concrete expressions of collegiality in a territory and, through fraternity, mutual support,
transparency and a wider consultation, become commonplace practices among bishops.
13. The Bishop of Rome in the College of Bishops
Convergences
a) The synodal dynamic also sheds new light on the ministry of the Bishop of Rome. Indeed,
synodality articulates symphonically the communal (“all”), collegial (“some”) and
personal (“one”) dimensions of the Church at the local, regional and universal levels. In
such a vision, the Petrine ministry of the Bishop of Rome is intrinsic to the synodal
dynamic, as are the communal aspect that includes the whole People of God and the
collegial dimension of the exercise of Episcopal ministry. Therefore, synodality,
collegiality, and primacy refer to each other: primacy presupposes the exercise of
synodality and of collegiality, just as both of them imply the exercise of primacy.
b) Promoting the unity of all Christians is an essential aspect of the ministry of the Bishop of
Rome. The ecumenical journey has deepened understanding of the ministry of the
Successor of Peter and must continue to do so in the future. Responses to the invitation
made by St. John Paul II in the encyclical Ut unum sint, as well as the conclusions of
ecumenical dialogues, can help the Catholic understanding of primacy, collegiality,
synodality, and their mutual relationships.
c) The reform of the Roman Curia is an important aspect of the Catholic Church’s synodal
journey. The Apostolic Constitution Praedicate evangelium insists that “the Roman Curia
does not stand between the Pope and the Bishops, rather it places itself at the service of
both in ways that are proper to the nature of each” (EP I.8). It promotes reform based on a
“life of communion” (EP I.4) and “healthy decentralization” (EP II.2). The fact that many
members of the Roman dicasteries are diocesan Bishops expresses the catholicity of the
Church and should foster the relationship between the Curia and local churches. The
effective implementation of Predicate evangelium may foster greater synodality within
the Curia both among the different dicasteries and within each of them.
Matters for Consideration
d) There is a need for more insight into how a renewed understanding of the Episcopate
within a synodal Church affects the ministry of the Bishop of Rome and the role of the
Roman Curia. This issue has significant implications for the way co-responsibility in
Church governance is lived out. At the universal level, the Code of Canon Law and
the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches offer provisions for a more collegial exercise
of papal ministry. These could be further developed in practice and strengthened in a future
update of both texts.
e) Synodality can shed light on ways in which Cardinals can collaborate in the Petrine
ministry and the ways in which their collegial discernment can be promoted in ordinary
and extraordinary consistories.
f) It is important for the good of the Church to study the most appropriate ways to foster
mutual acquaintance and bonds of communion among the members of the College of
Cardinals, taking into account also their diversity of origin and culture.
Proposals
g) The Visits ad limina Apostolorum are the highest moment of the relationships of the
pastors of the local churches with the Bishop of Rome and his closest collaborators in the
Roman Curia. It is necessary to review the form in which they are carried out so that they
become always more the occasion for open and mutual exchange that fosters communion
and a true exercise of collegiality and synodality.
h) In light of the synodal configuration of the Church, it is necessary for the dicasteries of the
Roman Curia to enhance the consultation of bishops, for greater attention to the diversity
of situations and a more attentive listening to the voices of local churches.
i) It seems appropriate to establish forms of evaluation of the work of the Pontifical
Representatives by the local churches in the countries where they carry out their mission
to facilitate and perfect their service.
j) It is proposed to enhance and strengthen the experience of the Council of Cardinals (C-9)
as a synodal council at the service of the Petrine ministry.
k) In the light of the teaching of Vatican II, it is necessary to carefully evaluate whether it is
opportune to ordain the prelates of the Roman Curia as bishops.
PART III – WEAVING BONDS, BUILDING COMMUNITIES
14. A synodal approach to formation
Convergences
a) Every baptised person is called to take care of their own formation as a response to the gifts
of the Lord, making use of the talents they have received in order that they bear fruit and
put them at the service of all. The time the Lord has dedicated to the formation of His
disciples reveals the importance of this ecclesial formation. This often happens in the
background yet it is decisive for mission. We would like to express a word of thanks and
encouragement to all those who are engaged in this work and invite them to welcome the
new orientations in regard to formation emerging from the Church’s synodal journey.
b) The way in which Jesus formed the disciples constitutes the model we need to follow. He
did not merely impart teaching but he shared his life with them. Through the example of
his own prayer He drew from them the request: ‘Teach us to pray’. By feeding the crowds
He taught them not to dismiss the needy. By walking to Jerusalem He showed the way to
the Cross. From the Gospel we learn that formation is not only or primarily a strengthening
of one’s own abilities; it is a conversion to the ‘logic’ of the Kingdom that can render even
defeats and failures fruitful.
c) The Holy People of God is not only the object but is first and foremost the co-responsible
subject of formation. The first formation, in fact, takes place in the family. It is here that
we usually receive the first proclamation of the faith in the language – indeed in the dialect
– of our parents and grandparents. Those who carry out a ministry in the Church must
therefore intertwine their contribution with the wisdom of all the faithful People of God in
a cooperation that is indispensable to the community. This is the first sign of a formation
understood in a synodal sense.
d) In Christian initiation we find guidance in how to navigate our formation path. At the heart
of Christian formation is a deepening of the kerygma, that is, the encounter with Jesus
Christ that offers us the gift of a new life. Catechumenal logic reminds us that we are all
sinners called to holiness. This is why we engage in a journey towards personal conversion
that the Sacrament of Reconciliation brings to fulfilment. This is also why we nourish the
desire for holiness, supported by a large number of witnesses.
e) The areas in which the formation of the People of God takes places are many. In addition
to theological formation, the Assembly requested training in specific skills: the exercise of
co-responsibility, listening, and discernment; conducting ecumenical and interreligious
dialogue, service to the poorest and care for our common home; engagement as “digital
missionaries”, facilitation of discernment processes, Conversation in the Spirit, consensusbuilding and conflict resolution. Particular attention should also be given to catechetical
formation of children and young people, which should involve the active participation of
the community.
f) Formation for a synodal Church needs to be undertaken synodally: the entire People of God
being formed together as they journey together. There is a need to overcome the
‘delegation’ mindset found in so many areas of pastoral ministry. Formation in a synodal
key is meant to enable the People of God to live out their baptismal vocation fully, in the
family, in the workplace, in ecclesial, social, and intellectual spheres. It is meant to enable
each person to participate actively in the Church’s mission according to his or her own
charisms and vocation.
Matters for Consideration
g) We recommend undertaking work on relationship and sexual education to accompany
young people as they mature in their personal and sexual identities and to support the
maturation of those called to celibacy and consecrated chastity. Formation in these areas is
a necessary aid at all stages of life.
h) It is important to deepen the dialogue between the human sciences, especially psychology
and theology, for an understanding of human experience that does not merely situate these
approaches by side by side but integrates them into a more mature synthesis.
i) The People of God need to be widely represented in formation programmes for ordained
ministry, as already requested by previous Synods. We need, therefore, a thorough review
of formation programmes, with particular attention to how we can foster the contribution
of women and families to them.
j) Episcopal Conferences are encouraged to work together at the regional level to create a
culture of lifelong formation and learning, using all available resources, including the
development of digital options.
Proposals
k) In the light of synodality, we propose that priority should be given to providing programmes
designed and intended for the joint formation of the entire People of God (laity, consecrated
and ordained ministers). Dioceses should endeavour to encourage these projects within the
local churches. We encourage Episcopal Conferences to work together at regional level to
create a culture of ongoing formation, using all available resources, including the
development of digital options.
l) A range of members of the People of God should be represented in formation programs for
ordained ministries, as already requested by previous Synods. The involvement of women
is of particular importance.
m) Adequate standards and processes for selecting candidates for ordained ministry need to be
applied to ensure that requirements for the propaedeutic programme for seminarians are
met.
n) Formation for ordained ministers should be designed in a way that is consistent with a
synodal Church in the different local contexts. Before embarking on specific paths
candidates should have a significant, albeit initial, experience of life in a Christian
community. Formation should not create an artificial environment separate from the
ordinary life of the faithful. By safeguarding the requirements of formation for ministry,
we can foster an authentic spirit of service to the People of God in preaching, celebrating
the sacraments and enacting charity. This may require a revision of the Ratio fundamentalis
for priests and permanent deacons.
o) In preparation for the next session of the Assembly, a consultation of those responsible for
the initial and ongoing formation of priests should be undertaken to assess how the synodal
process is being received and to propose changes that will promote the exercise of authority
in a style appropriate to a synodal Church.
15. Ecclesial Discernment and Open Questions
Convergences
a) The experience of Conversation in the Spirit was enriching for all who took part. Our style
of communication, privileging freedom in expressing one’s views and listening to each
other, was greatly appreciated. It avoided us moving too quickly to a debate based on the
reiteration of our own positions without listening first to the reasoning that supports the
position of others.
b) This basic approach creates a context that enables careful consideration of matters that are
controversial within the Church, such as the anthropological effects of digital technologies
and artificial intelligence, non-violence and legitimate self-defence, issues related to
ministry, and issues related to sexuality and “bodiliness”, among others.
c) To develop authentic ecclesial discernment in these and other areas, it is necessary to
approach these questions in the light of the Word of God and Church teaching, properly
informed and reflected upon. In order to avoid repeating vacuous formulas, we need to
provide an opportunity for a dialogue involving the human and social sciences, as well as
philosophical and theological reflection.
d) At the heart of many of these controversial matters lies the question of the relationship
between love and truth and the impact this has on many controversial matters. This
relationship, before being considered a challenge, is actually to be considered as a grace
revealed in Christ. For Jesus brought to fulfilment the promise found in the psalms: “Love
and truth shall meet, justice and peace shall embrace. Truth will sprout from the earth and
justice will come forth from heaven” (Ps 85:11-12).
e) Several Gospel passages reveal that Jesus meets people in the uniqueness of their personal
story and situation. He never begins from the perspective of prejudices or labels, but from
the authenticity of relationship to which he commits himself wholeheartedly, even at the
cost of experiencing misunderstanding and rejection. Jesus always listens to the cry for
help of those in need, even in situations in which it remains unexpressed. He engages in
gestures that communicate love and restore confidence; he makes new life possible with
his presence: those who meet him come away transformed. This happens because the truth
of which Jesus is the bearer is not an idea, but the very presence of God in our midst; and
the love with which he acts is not just a feeling, but the justice of the Kingdom that changes
history.
f) We can only support others if we ourselves are undergoing conversion, both personal and
communal. The difficulty we encounter in translating Jesus’ clear evangelical vision into
pastoral choices is a sign of our struggle to live up to the Gospel. If we use doctrine harshly
and with a judgmental attitude, we betray the Gospel; if we practise mercy ‘on the cheap’,
we do not convey God’s love. The unity of truth and love implies bearing the difficulties
of others, even making them our own, as happens between brothers and sisters. This unity
can only be achieved, however, by patiently following the path of accompaniment.
g) Certain issues, such as those relating to matters of identity and sexuality, the end of life,
complicated marital situations, and ethical issues related to artificial intelligence, are
controversial not only in society, but also in the Church, because they raise new questions.
Sometimes the anthropological categories we have developed are not able to grasp the
complexity of the elements emerging from experience or knowledge in the sciences and
require greater precision and further study. It is important to take the time required for this
reflection and to invest our best energies in it, without giving in to simplistic judgements
that hurt individuals and the Body of the Church. Church teaching already provides a sense
of direction on many of these matters, but this teaching evidently still requires translation
into pastoral practice. Even where further clarification is required, Jesus’ actions,
assimilated in prayer and conversion of heart, show us the way forward.
Matters for Consideration
h) It is necessary to continue ecclesial reflection on the original interweaving of love and
truth flowing from Christological revelation, with a view to an ecclesial practice faithful
to these origins.
i) We encourage experts in different fields to bring together their knowledge with their
personal spirituality so that what they offer is a real ecclesial service. What synodality
means in this context is a readiness to think together in the service of mission and in diverse
settings, but with a shared sense of purpose.
j) We identified a need for reflection on the conditions that enable theological and cultural
research that takes as its starting point the daily experience of God’s Holy People and
places itself at its service.
Proposals
k) We propose that initiatives enabling shared discernment on controversial doctrinal,
pastoral and ethical issues should be developed, in the light of the Word of God, Church
teaching, theological reflection and an appreciation of the synodal experience. This can be
accomplished through in-depth discussions among experts with diverse skills and
backgrounds, in an institutional setting that protects confidentiality and promotes frank
discussion. When appropriate it should also involve people directly affected by the matters
under consideration. Such initiatives should be set in motion before the next Session of the
Assembly.
16. Towards a Listening and Accompanying Church
Convergences
a) During the first two years of the synodal journey, including during our Assembly, listening
is the word that best expresses our experience. This is listening given and received.
Listening is a deeply human reality, a dynamic of reciprocity in which each makes a
contribution to the other’s journey while receiving a contribution to one’s own.
b) Many of those who participated in the synodal process at the local level, and especially
those who have suffered forms of marginalization in the Church or in society were greatly
surprised by the invitation to speak and be heard in the Church and by the Church. Being
deeply listened to is an experience of affirmation and recognition of dignity, and is a
powerful way of engaging people and communities.
c) Placing Jesus at the centre of our lives requires some degree of self-emptying. In this
perspective, providing a listening ear means being willing to ‘decentre’ oneself in order to
leave space for the other. We have experienced this in the dynamic of conversations in the
Spirit. It is a demanding ascetical exercise that obliges each person to recognize his or her
own limitations and the partiality of his or her point of view. Because of this, it opens the
possibility of listening to the voice of the Spirit of God that speaks to those beyond the
borders of the ecclesial community, and can initiate a journey of change and conversion.
d) Listening has a Christological significance; it means adopting Jesus’ attitude toward the
people he encountered (cf. Phil. 2:6-11). It also has an ecclesial value, since it is the
Church that is listening through the actions of the baptised who act not simply in their own
name but in the name of the community.
e) The Church encountered many people and groups along the synodal process asking to be
listened to and accompanied. We mention first and foremost young people, whose request
for listening and accompaniment resonated strongly in the Synod dedicated to them (2018)
and in this Assembly, confirming the need for a preferential option for young people.
f) The Church needs to listen with special attention and sensitivity to the voices of victims
and survivors of sexual, spiritual, economic, institutional, power and conscience abuse by
clergy members or persons with Church appointments. Authentic listening is a
fundamental element of the path to healing, repentance, justice and reconciliation.
g) The Assembly expresses its closeness to and support for all those who accept being alone
as a choice made in fidelity to the Church’s Tradition and Magisterium on marriage and
sexual ethics, which they recognise as source of life. Christian communities are invited to
be close to them, listen to them and accompany them in their commitment.
h) In different ways, people who feel marginalized or excluded from the Church because of
their marriage status, identity or sexuality also ask to be heard and accompanied. There
was a deep sense of love, mercy and compassion felt in the Assembly for those who are or
feel hurt or neglected by the Church, who want a place to call “home” where they can feel
safe, be heard and respected, without fear of feeling judged. Listening is a prerequisite for
walking together in search of God’s will. The Assembly reiterates that Christians must
always show respect for the dignity of every person.
i) People who suffer the many different forms of poverty, exclusion and marginalization
within our unequal societies also turn to the Church in search of love, listening and
accompaniment. This listening allows the Church to understand the realities of poverty
and marginalisation, and to draw close in friendship to those who suffer. Crucially it also
enables the Church to be evangelised by those who suffer. Listening to them allows the
Church to understand their point of view and to place itself concretely at their side, and to
be evangelised by them. We thank and encourage all those who are engaged in the service
of listening to and accompanying those who are in prison. They, in particular, need to
experience the merciful love of the Lord and to not feel isolated from the community. On
behalf of the Church, they realise the Lord’s words “I was in prison and you visited me”
(Mt 25:36).
j) Many people experience a condition of loneliness that is often close to abandonment. The
elderly and the sick ill are often invisible in society. We encourage parishes and Christian
communities to be close to them and listen to them. Works of mercy inspired by the Gospel
words “I was sick and you visited me” (Mt 25:39) have a profound significance for the
people involved and for fostering the wider bonds of community.
k) Finally, the Church wants to listen to everyone, not just those who can most easily make
their voices heard. In some regions, for cultural and social reasons, members of certain
groups, such as young people, women, and minorities, may find it more difficult to express
themselves freely in public or ecclesial spaces. Living under oppressive and dictatorial
regimes also erode this freedom. The same can happen when the exercise of authority
within the Christian community becomes oppressive rather than liberating.
Matters for Consideration
l) Listening requires unconditional acceptance. It does not mean compromising proclamation
of the Gospel or endorsing any opinion or position proposed. Jesus opened up new
horizons and pathways for the people to whom he listened unconditionally, and in order to
share the Good News of salvation with those we encounter we are called to do likewise.
m) Widespread in many parts of the world, small Christian communities foster listening
practices of, and amongst, the baptised. We are called to enhance their potential, in
particular, by exploring how they can be adapted to urban contexts.
Proposals
n) What would need to change in order for those who feel excluded to experience the Church
as more welcoming? Listening and accompaniment are a form of ecclesial action, not just
the actions of individuals. They must therefore find a place within the ordinary pastoral
planning and operational structuring of Christian communities at different levels, making
full use of spiritual accompaniment. A synodal Church needs to be a listening Church and
this commitment has to be translated into practice.
o) We do not start this work from scratch. Numerous institutions and structures carry out the
valuable task of listening, including the accompaniment work of Caritas amongst the
poorest, and among migrants and refugees, and the many other contexts of accompaniment
linked to consecrated life or lay associations. Connecting their work in a more integral way
with the local Church community enables this work to be seen as part of the life of the
whole community, not a delegated task.
p) Those performing the service of listening and accompaniment, in its various forms, need
adequate formation, taking into account the experiences of those they come into contact
with. They also need to feel supported by the community. For their part, communities
should become fully aware of the meaning of this service exercised on their behalf and to
receive the fruits of this listening. We propose establishment of a ministry of listening and
accompaniment in order to give greater prominence to this service. It should be grounded
in baptism and adapted to different contexts. The way this ministry is conferred should
promote the involvement of the community.
q) SECAM (Symposium of the Episcopal Conferences of Africa and Madagascar) is
encouraged to promote a theological and pastoral discernment on question of polygamy
and the accompaniment of people in polygamous unions who are coming to faith.
17. Mission in the Digital Environment
Convergences
a) Digital culture represents a fundamental change in the way we conceive of reality and
consequently relate to ourselves, one another, our surroundings, and even to God. The
digital environment changes our learning processes as well as our perception of time,
space, our bodies, interpersonal relationships and, indeed, much of our way of thinking.
The dualism between real and virtual does not adequately describe the reality and
experience of people, especially the youngest, the so-called “digital natives.”
b) Digital culture, then, is not so much a distinct area of mission as a crucial dimension of the
Church’s witness in contemporary culture. This is why it holds special significance in a
synodal Church.
c) Missionaries have always gone with Christ to new frontiers, while the Holy Spirit pushed
and preceded them. It is up to us to reach today’s culture in all spaces where people seek
meaning and love, including the spaces they enter through their cell phones and tablets.
d) We cannot evangelize digital culture without first understanding it. Young people, and
among them, seminarians, young priests, and young consecrated men and women, who
often have profound and direct experience of it, are best suited to carry out the Church’s
mission in the digital environment, as well as to accompany the rest of the community,
including pastors, in becoming more familiar with its dynamics.
e) Within the synodal process, the initiatives of the “Digital Synod” (“The Church Listens to
You” Project) show the potential of the digital environment approached in a missionary
key, the creativity and generosity of those who engage in it, and the importance of
providing them with training, accompaniment and opportunities for peer-to-peer
discussion and collaboration.
Matters for Consideration
f) The Internet is increasingly present in the lives of children and families. While it has great
potential to improve people’s lives, it can also cause harm and injury, such as through
intimidation, disinformation, sexual exploitation, and addiction. There is an urgent need to
consider how the Christian community can support families in ensuring that the online
space is not only safe but also spiritually life-giving.
g) There are many valuable and useful Church-related online initiatives that provide excellent
catechesis and faith formation. Unfortunately, there are also sites where faith-related issues
are addressed in a superficial, polarized and even hate-filled manner. As a Church and as
individual digital missionaries, we have a duty to ask ourselves how we can ensure that
our online presence constitutes an experience of growth for those with whom we
communicate.
h) Online apostolic initiatives have a reach and scope that extends beyond traditionally
understood territorial boundaries. This raises important questions about how they can be
regulated and which ecclesiastical authority should be responsible for supervision.
i) We must also consider the implications of the new digital missionary frontier for the
renewal of existing parish and diocesan structures. In an increasingly digital world, how
do we avoid being trapped within a mindset that seeks only to conserve what we are
already doing and instead unleash new energies for new forms of mission?
j) The COVID-19 pandemic stimulated a range of creative online pastoral initiatives that
reduced the effects of the experience of isolation and loneliness experienced particularly
by elderly and vulnerable community members. Catholic educational institutions also used
online platforms effectively to continue offering formation and catechesis during
lockdowns. We need to assess what this experience has taught us and what the lasting
benefits might be for the Church’s mission in the digital environment.
k) While young people do seek beauty, many young people have abandoned the physical
spaces of Church into which we continue to try to invite them, favouring instead online
spaces. This has implications for how we try to engage them and seek to offer them
formation and catechesis. This is something to consider from a pastoral perspective.
Proposals
l) We need to provide opportunities for recognising, forming, and accompanying those
already working as digital missionaries, while also facilitating networking amongst them.
m) It is important to create collaborative networks of influencers that include people of other
religions or indeed who may profess no faith, but who wish to collaborate on common
causes to promote human dignity, justice, and care for our common home.
18. Structures for Participation
Convergences
a) As members of the faithful People of God, all the baptised are co-responsible for mission,
each according to his or her vocation, competence and experience. Therefore, all contribute
to imagining and discerning steps to reform Christian communities and the Church as a
whole. In this way, the Church experiences “the sweet and comforting joy of evangelising.”
The purpose of synodality, in the composition and functioning of the bodies in which it
takes shape, is mission. Co-responsibility is for mission: this attests that we are truly
gathered in the name of Jesus, this frees the bodies of participation from bureaucratic
limitations and worldly logics of power, and makes gathering fruitful.
b) In the light of the recent teaching of the Church (in particular, Lumen gentium and
Evangelii gaudium), this co-responsibility of all in mission must be the criterion
underlying the structuring of Christian communities and the entire local church with all its
services, in all its institutions, in each of its pastoral bodies (cf 1 Cor 12:4-31). The proper
recognition of the laity for mission in the world cannot become a pretext for assigning the
care of the Christian community to bishops and priests alone.
c) The authority par excellence is that of the Word of God, which must inspire every meeting
of participatory bodies, every consultation and every decision-making process. For this to
happen, it is necessary that, at every level, the gathering draws meaning and strength from
the Eucharist and takes place in the light of the Word heard and shared in prayer.
d) The composition of the various councils for the discernment and decision-making of a
synodal missionary community must provide for the presence of men and women who
have an apostolic disposition, distinguished not by their frequent presence in church, but
by a genuine evangelical witness in ordinary life. The People of God are all the more
missionary when they can make the voices of those already living the mission by
inhabiting the world and its peripheries resonate within themselves, including in
participatory bodies.
Matters for Consideration
e) In light of what we have shared, it is important to ask how we can promote participation
in the various councils when many feel they are not up to the task. Synodality grows when
each member is involved in processes and decision-making for the mission of the Church.
In this sense, we are encouraged by many small Christian communities in the emerging
Churches, who live the closeness of the day-to-day, around the Word of God and the
Eucharist.
f) In Amoris Laetitia, Pope Francis entrusted the Church to make changes to the composition
of participatory bodies, this task cannot be further delayed. The participation of baptised
men and women living in complex situations of loving relationship “can be expressed in
different ecclesial services, which necessarily requires discerning which of the various
forms of exclusion currently practised in the liturgical, pastoral, educational and
institutional framework, can be surmounted” (299). This discernment also concerns their
exclusion from parish and diocesan community participation bodies as experienced in
some local churches.
g) From the perspective of the uniqueness of ecclesial communion: how can we interweave
the consultative and deliberative aspects of synodality? Given the variety of charismatic
and ministerial gifts of the People of God, how do we integrate the tasks of advising,
discerning, and deciding in the various participatory bodies.
Proposals
h) Based on the understanding of the People of God as the active subject of the mission of
evangelisation, we suggest legislating for the obligatory nature of Pastoral Councils in
Christian communities and local churches. It would also be desirable to strengthen the
bodies of participation, with a proper presence of the laity, recognising the role they can
play in discerning decisions by virtue of their baptism.
i) Participatory bodies represent the first instance in which to experience the accountability
of those who exercise responsibility. While we warmly welcome and support their
commitment, in turn, they are invited to practice the culture of accountability to the
community of which they are an expression.
19. Groupings of Churches within the Communion of the Whole Church
Convergences
a) The Holy Spirit abundantly distributes His gifts for the common good, and so we are
convinced that each Church, in the communion of the entire Church, has much to offer.
When we view the Church as the Body of Christ, we understand more easily that the
various members are interdependent and share the same life: “if one member suffers, all
the members suffer together with it; and if one member is honoured, all the members
rejoice with it” (1 Cor 12:26). We therefore want to develop the spiritual attitudes that
arise from this outlook: humility and generosity, respect and sharing. Also important are
the willingness to grow in mutual knowledge and to prepare the necessary structures so
that the exchange of spiritual riches, missionary discipleship and material goods can
become a concrete reality.
b) The question of groupings of local churches proved to be fundamental to the full exercise
of synodality in the Church. In responding to the question of how to configure instances
of synodality and collegiality involving groupings of local churches, the Assembly agreed
on the importance of ecclesial discernment carried out by the Episcopal Conferences and
Continental Assemblies for the proper conduct of the first phase of the synodal process.
c) The synodal process has shown how the bodies provided by the Code of Canon Law and
the Code of Canons for the Eastern Churches exercise their function more effectively
when these bodies are understood from the local churches. The fact that the Church
(Ecclesia tota) is a communion of Churches requires each bishop in a more direct and
binding way to exercise his duty of care for all the Churches (sollicitudo omnium
Ecclesiarum) as a constitutive aspect of his ministry as pastor of a Church.
d) Episcopal Conferences played a decisive role in the first phase of the synodal process. The
process brought out the need for synodality and collegiality at the continental level. Bodies
operating at these levels contribute to the exercise of synodality, respecting local realities
and processes of inculturation. The Assembly expressed confidence that by these means,
the risk of uniformity and centralization in the government of the Church will be overcome.
Matters for Consideration
e) Before creating new ecclesial structures, we need to strengthen and revitalize those that
exist. There is also a need for ecclesiological and canonical study of the implications of
the reform related to groupings of Churches, so that they may assume a more fully synodal
character.
f) Considering the synodal practices of the Church of the first millennium, we suggest a study
exploring how ancient institutions can be recovered in the current canonical order, and
harmonising them with newly created ones, such as Episcopal Conferences.
g) The doctrinal and juridical nature of Episcopal Conferences needs further study,
recognising the possibility of collegial action, including questions of doctrine that arise
locally, thus reopening reflection on the Motu Proprio Apostolos suos.
h) Could the canons referring to particular councils (plenary and provincial) be revised in
order to increase the participation of the People of God, following the example of the
dispensation obtained in the recent Plenary Council of Australia?
Proposals
i) Among the structures already provided for in the Code, the ecclesiastical province or
metropolitan see should be recovered and strengthened as a place of communion for the
local churches within their territory.
j) Relevant authorities should implement synodality at regional, national, and continental
levels in accordance with the insights that have emerged in regard to Church groupings.
k) Where necessary, we suggest creating international ecclesiastical provinces to benefit
bishops who do not belong to any Episcopal Conference and to promote communion
among Churches across national borders.
l) In Latin Rite countries in which there is also a hierarchy of Eastern Catholic Churches, we
recommend including Eastern Bishops in national Episcopal Conferences, leaving intact
their governmental autonomy established by their own Code.
m) A canonical configuration of the Continental Assemblies should be worked out that, while
respecting the particularity of each continent, takes due account of the participation of the
Episcopal Conferences and that of the Churches, with their own delegates who make
present the variety of the People of God.
20. The Synod of Bishops and Ecclesial Assemblies
Convergences
a) Even when the experience of “walking together” has been tiring, the Assembly sensed the
evangelical joy of being the People of God. The new experiences involved in this stage of
the synodal journey were generally welcomed. The most obvious ones include the shift of
the celebration of the Synod from an event to a process (as indicated by the apostolic
constitution Episcopalis communio); the presence of other members, women and men,
alongside the bishops; the active presence of fraternal delegates; the spiritual retreat in
preparation for the Assembly; the celebration of the Eucharist at St. Peter’s; the atmosphere
of prayer and the method Conversation in the Spirit; and the very arrangement of the
Assembly in the Paul VI Hall.
b) The Assembly of the Synod of Bishops, while preserving its eminently Episcopal
character, made tangible on this occasion the intrinsic link between the synodal dimension
of the life of the Church (the participation of all), the collegial dimension (the care of the
bishops for the whole Church), and the primatial dimension (the service of the Bishop of
Rome, guarantor of communion).
c) The synodal process was and is a time of grace which encourages us. God is offering us
the opportunity to experience a new culture of synodality, capable of guiding the life and
mission of the Church. We recalled, however, that it is not enough to create structures of
co-responsibility if personal conversion to a missionary synodality is lacking. Synodal
processes do not diminish the personal responsibility of those called to participate in it at
every level of the Church by virtue of their ministry and charisms, but rather solicit it all
the more.
Matters for Consideration
d) The presence of members other than bishops as witnesses to the synodal journey was
appreciated. However, the question remains open about the effect of their presence as full
members on the episcopal character of the Assembly. Some see the risk that the specific
task of the bishops will not be adequately understood. The criteria by which non-bishop
members are called to be part of the Assembly will also need to be clarified.
e) Experiences such as the first Latin-American and Caribbean Ecclesial Assembly of
November 2021, the Organisms of the People of God in Brazil, and the Australian Plenary
Council were reported. It remains to identify and deepen how to integrate synodality and
collegiality in the future, distinguishing (without undue separation) the contribution of all
members of the People of God to the elaboration of decisions and the specific task of the
bishops. The articulation of synodality, collegiality, and primacy should not be interpreted
in a static or linear form but according to a dynamic circularity, in a differentiated coresponsibility.
f) While at the regional level, it is possible to think of successive steps (an ecclesial Assembly
followed by an Episcopal Assembly), it is considered appropriate to clarify how this might
be proposed with reference to the Catholic Church as a whole. Some believe that the
formula adopted in this Assembly responds to this need; others propose that an Episcopal
Assembly follow an Ecclesial Assembly to conclude the discernment. Still, others prefer
to reserve the role of members of the Synodal Assembly to the Bishops.
g) The contribution to the Assembly’s work and the synodal Church’s processes, made by
experts from different disciplines, particularly theologians and canonists, also has
something to offer.
h) It will also be necessary to reflect on the interaction between the synodal process and
Internet and media communication.
Proposals
i) The synodal processes at all levels of the Church should be evaluated.
j) The fruits of the First Session of the XVI Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops should be evaluated.
PROCEEDING ALONG THE JOURNEY
“With what can we compare the kingdom of God, or what parable will we use for it”? (Mk 4:30)
The Word of the Lord takes precedence over words of the Church. The words of
disciples, even those of a Synod, are only an echo of what the Lord Himself says.
Jesus chose to speak in parables in order to announce the Reign of God. He found images
to speak of the mystery of God in the ordinary experiences of human life: the natural world,
the workplace, elements of the everyday. In this way, he let us know that the Reign of God
transcends us yet is not distant from us. Either we see God’s Reign in the things of this world,
or we will never see it.
Jesus saw his own destiny represented in a seed falling to the earth, something of no
value or significance destined to decay, yet possessing the dynamism of life, a dynamism that
is unstoppable, unpredictable, Paschal. This is a dynamism destined to give life; to become
bread for many; bread destined to become the Eucharist.
Today, in a culture where people struggle against one another for dominance and become
obsessed with what is visible, the Church is called to echo the words of Jesus, to bring them to
life again in all their potency.
“With what can we compare the kingdom of God, or what parable will we use for it?”
Our Lord’s question throws light on the work that now lies ahead of us. It is not a matter of
dispersing ourselves over several fronts, reducing everything to a logic of efficiency and
proceduralism. Rather, it is a matter of grasping, among the many words and proposals of this
Report, what appears as a small seed, yet one that bears the future, and of imagining how to
bring it to the soil that will enable it to grow and mature for the benefit of many. “How will
this happen?”, Mary asked herself in Nazareth (Lk 1:34) after hearing the Word. There is only
one answer: remain in the shadow of the Spirit and allow yourself to be enveloped by his
power.
As we look ahead to the period between now and the Second Session, let us thank the
Lord for the journey thus far and for the graces with which He has blessed it. We entrust the
next phase to the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary, a sign of sure hope and consolation
to the faithful People of God as they continue their journey, and to that of the Holy Apostles
Simon and Jude, whose Feast we celebrate today. We are all invited to welcome the small seed
that this Synthesis Report represents.
Adsumus Sancte Spiritus!
Rome, 28 October 2023, Feast of Ss. Simon and Jude, Apostles
